James Schmid said: .
So you're saying that if he had only had a 10 shot clip or 20 shot clip and had only killed 6 and injured 12 that would have been fine?
What did body armor have to do with it? Sure he was wearing it, but nobody shot at him anyway, It didn't enable him to kill any more or fewer people.
I don't know if 'fine' is the word I would use, but half the dead and 60 less wounded would certainly be better. Also, if he has to stop and reload, somebody would have had the opportunity to stop him. There was no shortage of bravery there, we know that several young men died while shielding their girlfriends.
Keep trying to rationalize that it's perfectly ok for everyone to have assault gear. Today's law abiding citizen is tomorrow's wacko. Some reasonable controls (waiting periods, clip size, munition type, etc) would be ok.