Forum Groups

 

SOPA

10 posts
  1. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    1/18/2012 5:01 AM
    Kind of had the general gist of it, but this explanation is concise and without rhetoric, which is rare.
    The crux of the issue coming in around the 4:00 mark.
    [youtube">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw5qucp7Hl4[/youtube">



  2. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    1/18/2012 6:01 AM
    There's a bit of irony here. The government wants to control the content on the internet; no surprise here. The government is placing the burden of controlling the content of the internet on someone else or essentially kicking the metaphorical can down the road; no surprise here either. The purpose of this regulation is to stop copy right piracy; sounds reasonable. But the government in it's usual "kill a fly with a bunker buster bomb mentality" strifes the entire internet community rather than being target specific. And backing this law are those who's material is pirated. Can't blame them really. I mean who among us wants our stuff stollen? But these people demand that someone else guard their stuff and guard it with what ever means necessary.



  3. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    1/18/2012 1:01 PM
    There's money to be made here by smart film producers. The ones with some foresight that give the consumer what they're willing to pay for are going to be rewarded while the ones that drag their feet and make content and distribution available the way THEY want will be left to rust. My money is on the internet community-at-large.



  4. Wallace Jeffrey V
    Wallace Jeffrey V avatar
    1/18/2012 1:01 PM
    SOPA and PIPA are both badly written legislation. Yes, I understand that copyrighted material should be protected, but it's not the job of say, Wikipedia, to act as lawyers for the entire planet. That site, in particular, allows anyone to post, edit, or submit links. If a particular company, or person, feels that their material is online without permission, then they should follow that link, discover the server of origin, and pursue them in court.

    They have that right. But they don't have the right to expect, again referencing Wikipedia, to expend their resources on lawyers. This is ridiculous regulation in the works to come up for a vote on the floor of both the House and the Senate. Far too sweeping, and allows any company, large or small, to have someone else do their work for them. Google is huge, and has bastante dinero to pay lawyers. They made it big, and can pay. Smaller companies don't have the money for lawyers. Too bad. Suck it up. And don't expect the larger companies to fight your battles for you, especially when they simply allowed a "link"....on a user-based site.

    This whole thing is absurd, and I'm happy to see these many sites blacked out today. I can wait until tomorrow to update my Wikipedia page. If I had one.



  5. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    1/18/2012 7:01 PM
    [img">http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png[/img">



  6. Wallace Jeffrey V
    Wallace Jeffrey V avatar
    1/18/2012 7:01 PM
    Clay Putnam, CGCS said: <a href="http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/?action=view&amp;current=Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>


    SAY WHAT?



  7. Clay Putnam
    Clay Putnam avatar
    33 posts
    1/18/2012 7:01 PM
    Jeffrey Wallace, CGCS said:
    Clay Putnam, CGCS said: <a href="http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/?action=view&amp;current=Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>


    SAY WHAT?


    The 1st and 2nd stabs didn't go as planned. This SOAP thing has me discombobulated.



  8. Wallace Jeffrey V
    Wallace Jeffrey V avatar
    1/18/2012 7:01 PM
    Clay Putnam, CGCS said:
    Jeffrey Wallace, CGCS said:
    Clay Putnam, CGCS said: <a href="http://s191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/?action=view&amp;current=Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z176/cbputnam/Screenshot2012-01-18at71738PM.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>


    SAY WHAT?


    The 1st and 2nd stabs didn't go as planned. This SOAP thing has me discombobulated.


    They have medicine for that, but if you take it too early in the evening, you might want to augment your sheets with a couple of towels.



  9. Melvin Waldron
    Melvin Waldron avatar
    43 posts
    1/19/2012 7:01 AM
    Saw a lot of politicians back away from the legislation they had sponsored. Heck our own Senator Blunt (MO-R) got caught using a pirated picture on his twitter feed.

    Seems the people won this first round instead of the money. Steve might have the practical answer, look at music, now instead of sharing a music file, I can get onto i-Tunes and even download the classic stuff that is currently sitting in my storage room on vinyl.

    Clay makes a good point, and the irony I see is the money wants their stuff protected, which is correct, but sounds like they don't want to pay to protect it, wants either the government, (I thought they wanted it smaller) or force the regulations to a burden on the middle person, (If I am understanding this correctly).

    Maybe we need the nerds and geeks as congress was calling them yesterday to explain it to us and them.....(or as Jon Stewart called them in his segment last night, experts).

    Mel

    Melvin H. Waldron III, CGCS, Horton Smith Golf Course, City of Springfield/Greene County MO

  10. Steven Kurta
    Steven Kurta avatar
    2 posts
    1/24/2012 12:01 AM
    .



View or change your forums profile here.