I've been noticing the design of some of the soft spike on the market have almost returned to the original aggressiveness of the old metal spike. Some of them have more "points" than there are spikes on each shoe. And now, today, after returning from the PGA show in Orlando, seeing the new spike technology, and thinking the same exact thing as I've always thought, I notice an article on TurfNet speaking of the issue.
From the article:
"Quinlan and Derby both said the damage they see from shuffling golfers is worse than what they remember with metal spikes. It's a simple matter of math, says Derby. Traditional golf shoes with metal spikes typically had 11 or 12 contact points with the turf. Although contemporary golf shoes accommodate about seven cleats, each plastic spike has six to eight protrusions. That means dozens of contact points with the turf. "
Have the spikes returned to equal or worse damage than before? I've seen the problems too, and can't help to think that the spikes of today are the culprit compared to what the original "soft" spikes were.
Thoughts?
The original article can be found here:
http://www.turfnet.com/view_news.php?obj_id=953