Forum Groups

 

Forums / Talking Turf / Which of these CRN sources are better?

Which of these CRN sources are better?

3 posts
  1. Dru Clark
    Dru Clark avatar
    0 posts
    8/30/2014 8:08 AM
    Just wondering which one, if either is more predictable. Any pro's or con's to either?

    Methylene Diurea or Triazone



  2. Jeremy Hreben
    Jeremy Hreben avatar
    0 posts
    8/30/2014 4:08 PM
    I think with most sources relying on weather, microbial activity, temperature, soil moisture, gravitational pull, or the position of the flux capacitor or whatever other things salesmen and marketing giants push nothing is predictable. I would think something quick, controlling the amount put down and how often you apply would be the most predictable.



  3. Dru Clark
    Dru Clark avatar
    0 posts
    9/1/2014 1:09 PM
    Jeremy Hreben said: I think with most sources relying on weather, microbial activity, temperature, soil moisture, gravitational pull, or the position of the flux capacitor or whatever other things salesmen and marketing giants push nothing is predictable. I would think something quick, controlling the amount put down and how often you apply would be the most predictable.


    10-4



View or change your forums profile here.