Forum Groups

 

Forums / Talking Turf / Actual Golf Course Area's vs Actual Application Areas

Actual Golf Course Area's vs Actual Application Areas

5 posts
  1. Ross Grieve
    Ross Grieve avatar
    4 posts
    4/18/2013 2:04 AM
    Dear fellow forum readers,

    I would like to ask what methods are being used to calculate (or make allowances) for the extra areas that you spray or apply a granular product to when making an application? For example, it is easy to calibrate the theoretical output of your boom sprayer or the application rate of a granular spreader, right, but how do you calculate to allow for all of the overlaps (boom spraying), and the extra product applied outside of the designated areas you want to apply the product to (both boom spraying and granular applications)?

    I ask this question as I am trying to calculate/impute realistic data (or as close to) for my TRIM's software so that the more accurate total product rates can be calculated relative to the actual area product is applied to and not the exact areas of the golf course area as measured by GPS or survey?

    Thanks in advance,

    Ross Grieve

    The Shek O Country Club, Hong Kong



  2. Andy Jorgensen
    Andy Jorgensen avatar
    1 posts
    4/18/2013 10:04 AM
    I figure about 5% wastage for those larger applications when I order product. Typically this is dead on. Significantly less on small applications like greens and tees. Probably closer to less than 2% overlap and wastage.



  3. Timothy Walker
    Timothy Walker avatar
    0 posts
    4/18/2013 4:04 PM
    Well if you know your acreage say 3 acres of tees and you spray at 100 gallons per acre, you would need 300 gallons to treat the tees. Whatever you use beyond that is your "overage"



  4. Fischer Austin J
    Fischer Austin J avatar
    4/19/2013 11:04 AM
    Andy Jorgensen said: I figure about 5% wastage for those larger applications when I order product. Typically this is dead on. Significantly less on small applications like greens and tees. Probably closer to less than 2% overlap and wastage.


    I typically figure for about 5% as well. Which does make me wonder where Smithco comes up with their "20% overspray" figure when trying to sell their GPS guided systems...



  5. Keith Pegg
    Keith Pegg avatar
    0 posts
    4/19/2013 4:04 PM
    Ross Grieve said: Dear fellow forum readers,

    I would like to ask what methods are being used to calculate (or make allowances) for the extra areas that you spray or apply a granular product to when making an application? For example, it is easy to calibrate the theoretical output of your boom sprayer or the application rate of a granular spreader, right, but how do you calculate to allow for all of the overlaps (boom spraying), and the extra product applied outside of the designated areas you want to apply the product to (both boom spraying and granular applications)?

    I ask this question as I am trying to calculate/impute realistic data (or as close to) for my TRIM's software so that the more accurate total product rates can be calculated relative to the actual area product is applied to and not the exact areas of the golf course area as measured by GPS or survey?

    Thanks in advance,

    Ross Grieve
    I use Planimeter and map the course by area and it is very close, works great and is fast.
    http://www.acme.com/planimeter/

    Keith Pegg
    Japan

    The Shek O Country Club, Hong Kong



View or change your forums profile here.