Forum Groups

 

Forums / Being a superintendent / Meyers Briggs Type Indicator MBTI

Meyers Briggs Type Indicator MBTI

6 posts
  1. Troy Alderson
    Troy Alderson avatar
    0 posts
    4/6/2016 8:04 PM
    How many here have taken the Meyers Briggs Type Indicator assessment? I have taken it several times and each time the assessment comes up INTJ. I have a very difficult time dealing with member owned country clubs such as where I am now. I am a good superintendent, highly educated, and still wish golfers would just play golf and enjoy the course without giving me their opinion. How about you? What is your type?



  2. Andy Jorgensen
    Andy Jorgensen avatar
    1 posts
    4/7/2016 7:04 AM
    I have done many personality tests over the years. When I did the Myers-Briggs assessment years ago, I was a ESTP.

    I have also taken a similar type test, and once spent an 8-hour day in class discussing the assessment. The test was a DISC test. Similar to the Myers-Briggs, this is a very in-depth assessment that nailed my personality traits right on the head. One of the things I remember most about this assessment is the instructor said that we actually have two different types of personalities. The first being who we are the majority of the time when conflict and stress aren't present. The other is who we have to be during stress and conflict. She related it to your work personality vs. your home personality. In some people, these are two distinct personalities, while in others they can be one in the same. For me, I am pretty laid back most of the time, but can be a real a$$ when I need to be.

    It's important to know what you are, but even more important to know what those around you are. Some of the most successful companies use this to there advantage and can identify strengths and weaknesses in their employees that can be used for success of the company. For instance, if you have an employee that is highly introverted, they probably won't work good in a group setting in speaking in front of a group. They don't like public recognition and tend to shy away from asking questions until they are in a room alone with you. On the opposite end, extroverts like being told "good job" in front of their peers, and will actually improve performance when this is done. Extroverts work great in a group setting, but this can often backfire if their are too many together as more talking tends to occur than working. Knowing this can be beneficial to a supervisor.



  3. Steven Scott
    Steven Scott avatar
    0 posts
    4/7/2016 4:04 PM
    A company came in and tested all the inside employees and outside staff at a course that I worked at right out of college. It was interesting that all the outside staff tested very similar to one another and all the pro shop/dining staff tested similar to each other as well. Takes a special kind of person to fold those sweaters all day....



  4. David Brandenburg
    David Brandenburg avatar
    3 posts
    4/8/2016 4:04 PM
    I have taken it twice and am a a committed ISTJ but do not really think about it or let it change my mind about things. I am who I am and that's who I am. I think the goal was to learn our and other department heads type was supposed to help us work together. Like I said, i do not use it nor wonder what other people are. I do my job and expect the same from them.

    From what you say, perhaps a resort type course with little customer interaction would fit you better.



  5. Troy Alderson
    Troy Alderson avatar
    0 posts
    5/2/2016 12:05 AM
    Thanks for your input David. When I first took the assessment it was to help department managers understand each other better. Where I am at, I have been excused from the board meetings, have a mature professional "kid" that I answer to along with the Green Chair, and now have to get approval for purchases after four seasons. I agree that a single owner golf course or resort golf course might be best. I am also thinking of teaching turf science at the college level. Right up my alley. I love science of golf course management.

    David Brandenburg, CGCS said: I have taken it twice and am a a committed ISTJ but do not really think about it or let it change my mind about things. I am who I am and that's who I am. I think the goal was to learn our and other department heads type was supposed to help us work together. Like I said, i do not use it nor wonder what other people are. I do my job and expect the same from them.

    From what you say, perhaps a resort type course with little customer interaction would fit you better.



  6. Troy Alderson
    Troy Alderson avatar
    0 posts
    5/2/2016 12:05 AM
    I had my staff take the test and found that I hired more "E" than "I". They like to talk about work while not working. ;) The assessment has helped me with how to manage my staff and back off as much as possible. I wonder if I need to take on more of a role as a teacher and guide than a doer of the work. I can be overly picky and need to let it go since I am the only one that will notice.

    I am also curious if there is a dominant type of Superintendent at different types of golf courses.

    Andy Jorgensen said: I have done many personality tests over the years. When I did the Myers-Briggs assessment years ago, I was a ESTP.

    I have also taken a similar type test, and once spent an 8-hour day in class discussing the assessment. The test was a DISC test. Similar to the Myers-Briggs, this is a very in-depth assessment that nailed my personality traits right on the head. One of the things I remember most about this assessment is the instructor said that we actually have two different types of personalities. The first being who we are the majority of the time when conflict and stress aren't present. The other is who we have to be during stress and conflict. She related it to your work personality vs. your home personality. In some people, these are two distinct personalities, while in others they can be one in the same. For me, I am pretty laid back most of the time, but can be a real a$$ when I need to be.

    It's important to know what you are, but even more important to know what those around you are. Some of the most successful companies use this to there advantage and can identify strengths and weaknesses in their employees that can be used for success of the company. For instance, if you have an employee that is highly introverted, they probably won't work good in a group setting in speaking in front of a group. They don't like public recognition and tend to shy away from asking questions until they are in a room alone with you. On the opposite end, extroverts like being told "good job" in front of their peers, and will actually improve performance when this is done. Extroverts work great in a group setting, but this can often backfire if their are too many together as more talking tends to occur than working. Knowing this can be beneficial to a supervisor.



View or change your forums profile here.