1/16/2014 3:01 PM
Just to add one more thought to my post...I am of the opinion that establishing a competitive culture among the crew is not a good management tactic, you all could have figured that out from my post. I also don't believe it is necessary. IMO, leadership's role is to create an atmosphere where everyone excels. Rather than trying to do that through competition I'd prefer to do it through accountability. Establishing standards, not waivering those standards, and holding the team accountable for those standards, I believe, creates long-term change. Competition among the crew, again IMO, only provides change as long as people think they can get personal gain. They don't care whether other team members gain BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE TO. At best, they focus only upon their own responsiblities and are ambivalent to others. By holding the team accountable they tend to try and help each other. Everyone has to get with the program or it becomes rapidly evident who doesn't "get it."
Jack Welch, Executive Chairman of the Jack Welch Management Institute at Strayer University, lists as one of his "Six Deadly Sins of Leadership" the lack of "Guts to Differentiate." What he means is that rather than deliver candid, rigorous performance reviews many managers give every employee the same kind of bland, mushy, "nice job" sign-off. Then, when rewards are doled out, they give their star performers a little bit more than the laggards. They may call this an egalitarian approach - or fair - but its really just a weakness in leadership.
I believe my role as a leader is to get everyone to the top and that I do that by setting standards and doing whatever is necessary to help each individual attain those standards. Top performers are always going to shine whether or not I single them out from the group. Top performers are not the key to success, however. The key is to bring up the level of performance in the remainder of the group.
Steve Ravenkamp, CGCS
Apache Stronghold Golf Course
San Carlos, AZ